Prediction of Hazel Redick Smith vs Beryl Bartlett Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
H. Redick Smith vs B. Bartlett

Hazel Redick Smith

RSA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

101

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Beryl Bartlett

RSA

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

101

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Smith 3 - 0 Bartlett

They have played 7 sets in total, with Hazel Redick Smith winning 6 and Beryl Bartlett winning 1. The last match between Hazel Redick Smith and Beryl Bartlett was at the Johannesburg Transvaal Chps, 13-09-1954, Round: SF, Surface: N/A, with Hazel Redick Smith getting the victory 6-1 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Smith	3
Bartlett	0

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(SF) Johannesburg Transvaal Chps(09-13-54)

Stats

Hazel Redick Smith

Beryl Bartlett

(SF) Johannesburg(04-08-54)

Stats

Hazel Redick Smith

Beryl Bartlett

(SF) Johannesburg Transvaal Chps(09-01-53)

Stats

Hazel Redick Smith

Beryl Bartlett

H. R. Smith vs B. Bartlett H2H Profile

H. R. Smith	Stats	B. Bartlett
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
77.88% (88-25)	Career Total W/L	57.52% (65-48)
2	Clay	0
1	Hard	0
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

H. R. Smith vs B. Bartlett Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hazel Redick Smith has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Beryl Bartlett has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hazel Redick Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Beryl Bartlett has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Hazel Redick Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beryl Bartlett has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Hazel Redick Smith has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Beryl Bartlett winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Hazel Redick Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 90% (W/L 9/1), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 75% (W/L 9/3). Beryl Bartlett has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 90% (W/L 21/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 26/27).
Player level: In the last year, Hazel Redick Smith has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Beryl Bartlett has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Hazel Redick Smith winning 3 times and Beryl Bartlett being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Hazel Redick Smith winning 6 and Beryl Bartlett winning 1.
The last match between Hazel Redick Smith and Beryl Bartlett was at the Johannesburg Transvaal Chps, 13-09-1954, Round: SF, Surface: N/A, with Hazel Redick Smith getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hazel Redick Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Beryl Bartlett has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hazel Redick Smith has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beryl Bartlett has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Hazel Redick Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beryl Bartlett has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Hazel Redick Smith vs Beryl Bartlett Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

H. R. Smith vs B. Bartlett H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

H. R. Smith	Stats	B. Bartlett
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	1
41	Games Won	20
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

H. R. Smith Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg Wanderers - 05-11-1956
Dora KilianD. Kilian	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg Transvaal Chps - 29-09-1955
F Gwendy LoveG. Love	L	4-6 7-5 6-3	Stats
Wengen - 21-07-1955
F Josefa De RibaJ. De	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
SF Therese PusterlaT. Pusterla	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
Gstaad - 11-07-1955
F Ruth KaufmannR. Kaufmann	W	1-6 6-1 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Bartlett Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
East London - 29-12-1958
Estelle Van TonderE. Van	W	6-1 3-6 6-4	Stats
SF Bernice CarrB. Carr	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Surbiton - 26-05-1958
R2 Mrs A HughesM. A	W	6-3 6-0	Stats
R3 Anthea GibbA. Gibb	L	3-6 6-2 7-5	Stats
Hurlingham - 28-04-1958
R3 Sonia CoxS. Cox	L	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

H. R. Smith vs B. Bartlett Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

H. R. Smith	Stats	B. Bartlett
77.88% (88/25)	YTD Win/Loss	57.52% (65/48)
74.90% (182/61)	Sets Win/Loss	56.91% (140/106)
60.66% (1380/895)	Games Win/Loss	53.46% (1197/1042)
90.00% (9/1)	Hard Win/Loss	55.56% (5/4)
75.81% (47/15)	Clay Win/Loss	49.06% (26/27)
79.31% (23/6)	Grass Win/Loss	67.74% (21/10)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
68.75% (11/5)	Slam W/L	40.00% (2/3)
78% (86/110)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (64/108)
57% (13/23)	Deciding Set Win %	62% (18/29)
94% (85/80)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (62/54)
6% (85/5)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (62/8)
24% (25/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (47/10)